DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORNS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1007
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No .NRO2997-14
10 October 2014
This is in reference to yout application for correction to your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section
1552.
wa three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October
2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, cogether with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record anc applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the
advisory opinion furnished by the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
(BUMED) letter 7220 Ser ML/14UMi-3171 of 24 Jul 2014, a copy of which
was provided to you on 15 August 2014, and is being provided to you
now.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
peen denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
Furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important ‘to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
Docket No. wWRO2997-14
demonstrate the existence of
Girt (/ 1 (AME
/ “Fr
ROBERT J. ONELTLL
Fxecutive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4396 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4022 14
OA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. Additionally, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 1 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4147 14
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval the burden is om the applicant record, probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4190 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5864 14
NT i] F THE NAVY ACO ADOTA wit in POARD FOR COR ection OF NAVAL REG! Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5420 PERS-806 of 17 Jul 2014, @ copy of which was provided to you on 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5107 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 7 Nov 2014, However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3396 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments your application has contained in the advisory opinion. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4400 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket MNo.NkKO44U0-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofiiciai naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5099 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. evidence not previously considered by the Board its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3321 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC (memo. NR3321-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.